But generally in sci-fi, the clones, after finding out who they really are, usually choose
(or are forced
) to live the way their creators intended. I guess because usually their "parents" are the protagonists, and if the clones try to take over they would become the antagonist. And if they succeed, the story would be a tragedy, which simply doesn't happen nowadays in TV and movies.
In Voyager, the Kim and Paris clones had no choice but remain on the planet they were born in
(or they'd die
), and they accepted that fact. In SG-1, the team's robotic clones also needed to be recharged by their creator, and they also accepted that fact. However in both cases there is a follow-up episode where the clones would eventually try to live the lives of their parents, and ultimately fail.
What's so strange about Moon is that they put the clones as the protagonists, and so they have to succeed
(at least partially
) in their evil plan of betraying their creator. I guess it's a twist on the concept, but one that doesn't make much sense to me, especially if I think the clones should fail to be justice. And personally if I found out I was a clone I would simply accept that and live on the way I am supposed to.
Speaking of clones, how come we don't talk about Clone Wars anymore? In Canada we had a short down time after all channels dropped the series after season one. But recently Teletoon picked up the series and we get to see season two with almost no delay.
The Star Wars clones make more sense in that they do not retain Jango's memory, and they are altered to be obedient... "Execute order 66!" Sorry I had to

But it's interesting as quite often Clone Wars episodes go into the clones' mentality; there was even one clone who ran away from the war and got himself a family. But in general there's no point for clones to be created if they betray their creators and become individuals.