|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 3,679 |
Location: | Japan | Status: | |
| How about a little grep & ramdisk? |
|
| |
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 3,679 |
Location: | Japan | Status: | |
| also off topic, but check this out. http://www.dwavesys.com/Edited by stingraze 2014-06-07 5:28 PM
|
|
| |
|
H/PC Sensei Posts: | 1,169 |
Location: | Russia | Status: | |
| Quote C:Amie - 2014-06-07 1:05 PM
Sounds as though it must have been trying to build the index exclusively in memory. As you terminated it, it must have never committed the work.
You could try leaving it running over night of you were desperate for it back.
Yes sure. I won't.  |
|
| |
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 3,679 |
Location: | Japan | Status: | |
| Quote Alt Bass - 2014-06-08 2:39 AM
Quote C:Amie - 2014-06-07 1:05 PM
Sounds as though it must have been trying to build the index exclusively in memory. As you terminated it, it must have never committed the work.
You could try leaving it running over night of you were desperate for it back.
Yes sure. I won't.
Desperado, why don't you come to your senses..
you've been outriding sigmarion for so long now...  |
|
| |
|
Global Moderator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 12,668 |
Location: | Southern California | Status: | |
| LOL  |
|
| |
|
H/PC Sensei Posts: | 1,169 |
Location: | Russia | Status: | |
| Upon loading in safe mode whopping 100 MB are "available" in addition to those 7000 MB.
Microsoft is doing something wrong. |
|
| |
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 17,985 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| The better question is what in the processes are consuming 900MB of actual RAM? Are you reading actual or committed?
|
|
| |
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 3,679 |
Location: | Japan | Status: | |
| Quote CE Geek - 2014-06-10 5:33 PM
LOL
Hey stingraze, why are you so dumb.... you've been doing this HPC business since 2001?? ..
Remember, C:Amie's got your back and so does the .. communn i ty...
Hey dude, don't forget, we were ahead of times....... la la..   |
|
| |
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 3,679 |
Location: | Japan | Status: | |
| Quote C:Amie - 2014-06-11 6:11 AM
The better question is what in the processes are consuming 900MB of actual RAM? Are you reading actual or committed?
Avril Lavigne - "Why do you have to take things so complicated.... Life's like this you know, you fall and you crawl and you get what you get and turn them into Sigmarion 777s and not 666s. |
|
| |
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 3,679 |
Location: | Japan | Status: | |
| Quote Alt Bass - 2014-06-11 5:10 AM
Upon loading in safe mode whopping 100 MB are "available" in addition to those 7000 MB.
Microsoft is doing something wrong.
idea, somehow make Readyboost for Windows CE, Alt Bass. Worth a try. |
|
| |
|
H/PC Sensei Posts: | 1,169 |
Location: | Russia | Status: | |
| Quote C:Amie - 2014-06-11 12:11 AM
The better question is what in the processes are consuming 900MB of actual RAM? Are you reading actual or committed?
I am reading "available". AFAIC it is commited minus what is moved to swap file.
After another attempt it is better but still awful for a safe mode.
 Edited by Alt Bass 2014-06-11 9:03 AM
|
|
| |
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 17,985 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| Private is what really counts there as that is exclusive to the application and isn't being double counted due to shared resource loading.
As you have it sorted by the Commit limit, MsMp is Windows Anti-malware. If you shutdown Windows Defender and Forefront (if installed) you will free that.
Without seeing the rest of the services list from an elevated view, it is hard to say. That said, I would be more concerned with the number of hard faults that you are getting. My desktop machine has had uptime of a month and there isn't a single hard fault in the list. If you are in safe mode and getting hard faults... something else is wrong. Do you get them when running normally (with plenty of free RAM)? |
|
| |
|
H/PC Sensei Posts: | 1,169 |
Location: | Russia | Status: | |
| Quote C:Amie - 2014-06-11 12:35 PM
Without seeing the rest of the services list from an elevated view, it is hard to say.
Where is that elevated thing?
Quote C:Amie - 2014-06-11 12:35 PM
That said, I would be more concerned with the number of hard faults that you are getting. My desktop machine has had uptime of a month and there isn't a single hard fault in the list. If you are in safe mode and getting hard faults... something else is wrong. Do you get them when running normally (with plenty of free RAM)?
Isn't a hard fault just a cache miss or a read from HDD? |
|
| |
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 17,985 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| Use the search bar on the start menu to search for resource monitor, right click, run as administrator
No, a Hard Fault is when the system asks for Memory that turns out not to be available/allocated to it. It then performs either a page seek (to put it somewhere else) or a page swap (send it to disk) in order to satisfy the allocation request. Very slow, very expensive.
p.s. shutdown windows defender from its UI first and then disable the service. If you just disable the service, you get errors. |
|
| |
|
H/PC Sensei Posts: | 1,169 |
Location: | Russia | Status: | |
| Here it is - not more representative by a smallest margin.
http://storage8.static.itmages.ru/i/14/0611/h_1402492366_3938366_056af58554.jp
The Defender was already disabled, it was Microsoft Antimalware service instead.
I hope that I don't bother you too much. I just have a hope to get understanding of what exactly uses so much memory nowadays. Edited by Alt Bass 2014-06-11 2:15 PM
|
|
| |
