x
This website is using cookies. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. More info. That's Fine
HPC:Factor Logo 
 
Latest Forum Activity

MS-DOS 6.22 Full Installation on HPC!

1 2
hpcboy Page Icon Posted 2020-11-11 3:48 PM
#
Avatar image of hpcboy
H/PC Philosopher

Posts:
256
Location:
Hong Kong SAR
Status:
After running DOS programs under PocketDOS for a couple of weeks, I decided to go the full monty by installing the complete MS-DOS 6.22 (plus the supplement disk) on my Jornada 720.

Here is a quick demonstration of how to get this done.

Part I: Preparation
Ready MS-DOS 6.22 disk images >> Launch PocketDOS >> Create a new harddisk (virtual HDD image) as C:





Edited by hpcboy 2020-11-11 3:49 PM
 Top of the page
hpcboy Page Icon Posted 2020-11-11 3:48 PM
#
Avatar image of hpcboy
H/PC Philosopher

Posts:
256
Location:
Hong Kong SAR
Status:
Part II. Installation
Set up A: by supplying the DOS Disk 1 image >> Initiate setup >> Exit setup (press F3) >> Run fdisk (and restart PocketDOS) >> Run format C: /s for the HDD image (and restart PocketDOS) >> Launch MS-DOS setup again >> Continue the previous setup >> Confirm country, keyboard layout, and installation directory >> Begin the installation procedure >> Supply the next disk image when prompted





Edited by hpcboy 2020-11-11 3:50 PM
 Top of the page
hpcboy Page Icon Posted 2020-11-11 3:48 PM
#
Avatar image of hpcboy
H/PC Philosopher

Posts:
256
Location:
Hong Kong SAR
Status:
Part III. Finetuning
Restart PocketDOS to boot the newly installed MS-DOS (need to set the boot priority to C: ) >> Load the MS-DOS Supplemental Utilities Disk image >> Run setup >> Select and install the components >> Load PocketDOS Disk Utility image to A: >> Copy A:\DOS\*.* C:\DOS >> Copy A:\config.sys >> Copy A:\autoexec.bat >> Edit autoexec.bat to set the right PATH (A:\DOS becomes C:\DOS)




Edited by hpcboy 2020-11-11 3:51 PM
 Top of the page
hpcboy Page Icon Posted 2020-11-11 3:57 PM
#
Avatar image of hpcboy
H/PC Philosopher

Posts:
256
Location:
Hong Kong SAR
Status:
Why full installation? It contains a large arsenal of MS-DOS tools and programs (even QBasic and DOS Shell) that are absent from the vanilla FreeDOS.





Isn't it cool?

Also see how much memory MS-DOS consumes upon booting up:



Despite the quantum increment of computing power and memory space (640KB vs. 640GB), I simply don't think our productivity has been increased by this many times over these years.


Edited by hpcboy 2020-11-11 3:57 PM
 Top of the page
Jake Page Icon Posted 2020-11-11 7:30 PM
#
Avatar image of Jake
Moderator
H/PC Vanguard

Posts:
2,826
Location:
Choking on the stench of ambition in Washington DC
Status:
Well done. And thank you for posting such specific instructions--that will assist other for years to come.

I suppose if you had a HP 200LX, you could run its desktop software (CPACK) on the J, sharing HP's databases, etc.

How does DOShell run? That can be a memory hog, but it was my first GUI adventure.

Jake
 Top of the page
Mjolnir Page Icon Posted 2020-11-11 8:03 PM
#
Avatar image of Mjolnir
Factorite (Elite)

Posts:
210
Location:
United States
Status:
I used to run Arachne on the DOS side of one of my Win 95 machines, a pretty sweet internet suite.
Good work and good write-up, OP.

Edited by Mjolnir 2020-11-11 8:06 PM
 Top of the page
hpcboy Page Icon Posted 2020-11-12 4:10 AM
#
Avatar image of hpcboy
H/PC Philosopher

Posts:
256
Location:
Hong Kong SAR
Status:
Quote
Jake - 2020-11-12 2:30 PM

Well done. And thank you for posting such specific instructions--that will assist other for years to come.

I suppose if you had a HP 200LX, you could run its desktop software (CPACK) on the J, sharing HP's databases, etc.

How does DOShell run? That can be a memory hog, but it was my first GUI adventure.

Jake


My demo is actually based on the PocketDOS official tutorial.
I don't have 200LX, but will try to find a copy of CPACK to test it out. Sounds fun.
[EDIT 1: Just searched a bit. CPACK is written for 80286/80386. PocketDOS cannot run CPACK as it emulates only 8086/80186]
DOShell runs fine. Starting up takes about 7 seconds. Once loaded everything works smoothly. I didn't notice obvious lag. In fact DOShell only uses an additional 250KB of memory, which is definitely manageable under PocketDOS.
[EDIT 2: After changing the refresh Timer from 5ms to 1ms, DOSShell launches in just 2 seconds!]


Edited by hpcboy 2020-11-12 4:41 AM
 Top of the page
Jake Page Icon Posted 2020-11-12 9:48 PM
#
Avatar image of Jake
Moderator
H/PC Vanguard

Posts:
2,826
Location:
Choking on the stench of ambition in Washington DC
Status:
Re: CPACK--dunno much about DOS flavors, but I run CPACK on Win10 thru DOSBox, so I'm surprised that PocketDOS would have problems. Oh, well.

Glad to see DOSShell up and running. Can a user hide the bottom row of Fn keys in PDOS? Seems a waste of real estate.

Before TextMaker's 2002 birth, I was very much considering PDOS/NewDeal for my word processing on the J-720. I do love me some NewDeal--what a great suite.

Jake
 Top of the page
ntware Page Icon Posted 2020-11-13 3:29 PM
#
Avatar image of ntware
H/PC Elite

Posts:
660
Location:
Florida, US
Status:
Quote
hpcboy - 2020-11-11 11:10 PM
[EDIT 1: Just searched a bit. CPACK is written for 80286/80386. PocketDOS cannot run CPACK as it emulates only 8086/80186]

If you change the CPU emulation core on PocketDOS you can actually emulate other CPUs. Many moons ago I managed to emulate an 80486 on PocketDOS to run Windows 3.1 in standard mode. You can find the full discussion here: https://www.hpcfactor.com/forums/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=15103
obs: please ignore my English from the post above. At that time, I didn't know how to properly write in English...
 Top of the page
fantablium Page Icon Posted 2020-11-13 7:55 PM
#
Avatar image of fantablium
Subscribers
Factorite (Elite)

Posts:
150
Status:
This is a great tutorial, never really been a DOS user other than disk tools but impressed it'll all run on the J720. Wonder if it could handle win3.1??
 Top of the page
hpcboy Page Icon Posted 2020-11-14 2:35 AM
#
Avatar image of hpcboy
H/PC Philosopher

Posts:
256
Location:
Hong Kong SAR
Status:
Windows 3.1 runs fine under PocketDOS. The only question is you need to find an installer or hdd image yourself.
For the moment I don't feel a strong need to run Win 3.x as I am very happy with the text-based DOS programs. For GUI stuff I simply fall back to CE.
 Top of the page
hpcboy Page Icon Posted 2020-11-14 2:36 AM
#
Avatar image of hpcboy
H/PC Philosopher

Posts:
256
Location:
Hong Kong SAR
Status:
Quote
ntware - 2020-11-14 10:29 AM

Quote
hpcboy - 2020-11-11 11:10 PM
[EDIT 1: Just searched a bit. CPACK is written for 80286/80386. PocketDOS cannot run CPACK as it emulates only 8086/80186]

If you change the CPU emulation core on PocketDOS you can actually emulate other CPUs. Many moons ago I managed to emulate an 80486 on PocketDOS to run Windows 3.1 in standard mode. You can find the full discussion here: https://www.hpcfactor.com/forums/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=15103
obs: please ignore my English from the post above. At that time, I didn't know how to properly write in English...


That's wonderful "news" to me. Will give it a try soon.
 Top of the page
ntware Page Icon Posted 2020-11-14 1:39 PM
#
Avatar image of ntware
H/PC Elite

Posts:
660
Location:
Florida, US
Status:
If you’re looking for a GUI experience on PocketDOS, Windows 3.0 in real mode runs a lot smoother than Windows 3.1 in standard mode with a 80486 plugin
 Top of the page
Jake Page Icon Posted 2020-11-14 2:23 PM
#
Avatar image of Jake
Moderator
H/PC Vanguard

Posts:
2,826
Location:
Choking on the stench of ambition in Washington DC
Status:
For some reason, I've always wanted to run 3.1 on the J-720, if only to use 16-bit Word 6.0, a wonderful word processor. On the other hand, TextMaker2002 is even better, so I can't account for my fascination. [I think Word 2.0, another good wp, will run on Win3.0]

Jake
 Top of the page
ntware Page Icon Posted 2020-11-14 2:45 PM
#
Avatar image of ntware
H/PC Elite

Posts:
660
Location:
Florida, US
Status:
If I remember correctly, Win 3.1 on PocketDOS is only worth as a science project because it is too slow to be usable. Win 3.0 in real mode on the other hand is quite snappy.
 Top of the page
1 2
Jump to forum:
Seconds to generate: 0.197 - Cached queries : 70 - Executed queries : 11