C:Amie - 2005-08-07 12:43 AM
I thought about going over the windows, but I think things like that are just irritating.
I've emailed you my PSD.
Thank you for the PSD!
I had a look at it and thought "nice!!!". It has also given me some insparation for the next trial version "told you it was a draft!
Now, as for images..... I meant an unmodified one for the MP, and a few others you may want to put on. Then again, shall I use that remote Jornada that ws on your site a while ago?
Oh wait!! I just thought, I need my dads camera for the next excersie, because if I clean up my MP real good and use paper as my background
(I am glad I got some A2 paper!
), I might be able to do it myself. I'll have to see. The only other thing, windows logos, that would be an interesting one and err........... any other images you want to stick on.. err sorry! Vynal on!
As for going over the windows, not always true, I wish I had a pic of that "Recyling Bus"
(has a Portsmouth all over recyling advert on one side!
) which can demostrate, that even if you cover over the windows, it doesn't intrude the passangers vision. Unless you do waht "First" do, that is stick on non transparent vynals over the windows, which do get irratating!
Megabus
(partial covering of the windows
) example:
The price at the back of the bus and the figure that covers the front window isn't solid! Instead, it is printed in the way that if you made it out of pixels, the image of alterniting pixels
(transparent and soild for every 2 pixels
) would look like this:
I wouldn't suggest using this partially across the window as when I used one megabus example, it made my eyes go funny, because of the difference between fully transparent and partially transparent.
(also, as I was writing this message, I also tried out the "noise" modifier in Paintshop Pro, this is the result when I exported the same image with the noise modifier added as a single colour transparent PNG file:

)
Comments?