|
| ProgramSynthesiser - 2005-11-27 6:33 PM
Do I need to repeat this on another thread? 
CE 2 does not have all of the functions (or something like that ) that CE 2.1 and 3 have. Because of that, the bootloader would have to be completely rewritten to work. As I have said before: It is possible, but someone has to do it.
lol, if I had knowledge of what is stuffing it up and what the difference is between ce 2 and 2.1 then I'd give it a shot...  |
|
| |
|
Subscribers H/PC Guru Posts: | 5,708 |
Location: | United States | Status: | |
| CE 2.1 is a minor upgrade to CE 2.0.
List of improvements...
Quote
TCP/IP enhancements
FAT32 Support
Modular File system wrapper, capable of supporting up to 256 different file systems
The Object Store maximum size was increased from 4MB to 16MB
Software Input Panel (SIP) capabilities built into the OS
The first Platform Builder release, all shell licensing controls were removed, but no example shell was provided
Command Line Processor
Fast Infrared Port (FIR) Hardware Support
Universal Serial Bus Controller Support (USB)
Larger File Handling Abilities
Placement of Databases on External Storage Mediums
|
|
| |
|
H/PC Elder Posts: | 2,294 |
Location: | Sunny California | Status: | |
| It also added certain functions to CE.
Somewhere on this Linux/Unix forum is the list of the functions missing, or something similar. Search the forum yourself, I do not want to. |
|
| |
|
| WinCE 2.0 can use pbsdboot.exe. In that case, aren't you putting this guy off un-necessarily? |
|
| |
|
H/PC Elder Posts: | 2,294 |
Location: | Sunny California | Status: | |
| No, not really. It does not work properly. Give me a successful boot in txt format, and we will see. |
|
| |
|
H/PC Elder Posts: | 1,712 |
Location: | New Mexico, US | Status: | |
| ProgramSynthesiser - 2006-01-31 10:32 PM
No, not really. It does not work properly. Give me a successful boot in txt format, and we will see.
No boot transcript, but from the detailed setup info, I would concur that it *does* run on wince2.0.
http://www.beacon.com/~rausch/velo/
NetBSD folks have been running it since 2000 and from this thread, its on wince1.0 and above!
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-hpcmips/2000/07/01/0000.html
One more thread ... you get the idea! 
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-hpcmips/2000/09/17/0000.html |
|
| |
|
H/PC Oracle Posts: | 16,175 |
Location: | Budapest, Hungary | Status: | |
| namit - 2006-02-01 3:50 AM
WinCE 2.0 can use pbsdboot.exe. In that case, aren't you putting this guy off un-necessarily?
you're right. even CE 1.0 can run bootloaders for unix. |
|
| |
|
H/PC Elder Posts: | 2,294 |
Location: | Sunny California | Status: | |
| Well then someone send me a Velo 1, otherwise I won't play with it.
Haha, everyone knows that I am useless until I can program anyways.  |
|
| |
|
H/PC Elder Posts: | 1,712 |
Location: | New Mexico, US | Status: | |
| ProgramSynthesiser - 2006-02-01 6:47 PM
Well then someone send me a Velo 1, otherwise I won't play with it.
Haha, everyone knows that I am useless until I can program anyways.
aawww ... of cos you are not!  ... you got the J720 build right there eh? |
|
| |
|
| I'm trying to load Netbsd on a Nec 800. The ftp address is wrong. If you go to hpcmips is comes up mipsel?? How did you do it? |
|
| |
