|
H/PC Philosopher Posts: | 490 |
Location: | United States | Status: | |
| |
|
|
|
H/PC Philosopher Posts: | 464 |
Location: | Virginia, USA | Status: | |
| Pretty soon we will not be able to say a word without a C & D error occurring. I think I will trademark the word "the" and charge everyone who uses my word.... uh 1ยข (per use). That should do it. |
|
|
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 18,043 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| It seems a little power crazed doesn't it, considering all the free publicity they're getting, however it's the mark of a failed trademark that the devices are not brand associated with Psion.
Taking it from the perspective of the law, if Psion want to maintain the trademark, they are obligated to follow up on infractions or they cannot pursue formal litigation surrounding breaches. |
|
|
|
H/PC Philosopher Posts: | 464 |
Location: | Virginia, USA | Status: | |
| I think it would be more advantageous to Psion to be known as "the maker of the original netbook", than to be known as the company that peed on the netbook parade. |
|
|
|
Global Moderator H/PC Guru Posts: | 7,188 |
Location: | USA | Status: | |
| |
|
|
|
Global Moderator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 12,674 |
Location: | Southern California | Status: | |
| I doubt it'd hold up in court. "Netbook" is prima facie a pretty generic term. That'd be kinda like everyone named Miranda suing for defamation of character over the use of the term " Miranda rights" on the argument that it implies they've all been arrested. |
|
|
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 18,043 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| It is prima facie now, but was it when they protected it. |
|
|
|
Factorite (Elite) Posts: | 196 |
Location: | somewhere to the left of Pluto | Status: | |
| Quote Rich Hawley - 2008-12-25 2:23 PM
As I understand it, Psion didn't copyright the word "netbook," rather it was the hardware. But who knows...it seems like a threat to bite someone, but has no teeth. Time will tell.
The term netbook is trademarked, not copyrighted. Psion registered the trademark in 2000 (in the USA ).
I think Psion Teklogic has a pretty good case. |
|
|
|
H/PC Philosopher Posts: | 464 |
Location: | Virginia, USA | Status: | |
| Here's a legal question for you:
Psion's original device was not the NetBook, but the Netbook Pro. So if a company trademarks a name, can they legally forbid using a portion of their trademarked name? How far can they go? Can they also send C & D letters to everyone who writes about a net, or a book? |
|
|
|
Factorite (Elite) Posts: | 196 |
Location: | somewhere to the left of Pluto | Status: | |
| No the original device was the Netbook. It ran Release 5 of the EPOC32 OS (Symbian is Release 6, 7, 8 of the same OS). The Netbook Pro was a WinCE based device with all hardware identical (except for the mainboard).
And the trademark is for the word "netbook", not "netbook pro".
Edited by Nate the great 2008-12-25 6:07 PM
|
|
|
|
H/PC Philosopher Posts: | 464 |
Location: | Virginia, USA | Status: | |
| I stand corrected, but still feel that trademark arguments are carried too far sometimes. Netbook (lately) has been a description more than a model name. It reminds me of MS's shenanigans trying to prevent anyone from using the word "Windows". |
|
|
|
Factorite (Elite) Posts: | 196 |
Location: | somewhere to the left of Pluto | Status: | |
| This case isn't so unreasonable. The term is now worth a fair amount of money, and Psion did think of it first. What's wrong with Psion making money off of their idea?
If you want to read a truly infuriating trademark case, try MonsterCable:
http://www.tabberone.com/Trademarks/HallOfShame/MonsterCable/MonsterCable.shtml |
|
|
|
H/PC Philosopher Posts: | 464 |
Location: | Virginia, USA | Status: | |
| |
|
|
|
Global Moderator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 12,674 |
Location: | Southern California | Status: | |
| Prepare to change your sig, theoak. |
|
|
|
H/PC Philosopher Posts: | 464 |
Location: | Virginia, USA | Status: | |
| Done! |
|
|