Earlier in this thread, chiark wrote "You can't just take stuff generated by PB and copy it over the windows directory, unfortunately. You need to replace the whole ROM..."
However, Tapani Otala, author of the iPAQ Storage brick, writes on his web site, "It turns out that the standard ATADISK.DLL driver is simply a bit dense as well as picky. I was able to create a new device driver based [on] some minor modifications to the original ATADISK.DLL driver code from the Microsoft WIndows CE Platform Builder 3.0 package."
(http://www.tjotala.com/hardware/storagebrick/default.htm
)
I have interpreted this -- and other comments on the web -- to mean that one could take output from the PB and use it as a driver, etc. to provide additional functionality. I have been specifically interested in "developing" mouse and other drivers for my NEC MobilePro 890
(an 880 "upgraded" with a 790 ROM
). Have I misinterpreted things? Is it possible to use the PB for this purpose? If not, is there a different/better way?
Also, what would the legalities be? Microsoft is apparently not opposed to Otala's use of the PB -- his driver is well known and even recommended by Addonics
(http://www.addonics.com/support/download/
). If I were to develop an 890 mouse driver using the PB, could I legally use it? Provide it free of charge to others in the HPC community?
I would really like to hear your reactions. And, if you have a better solution for the mouse problem, I would really like to hear that as well.
Thanks,
Bruce
MP890 Evangelist