|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 17,497 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| Please excuse any downtime you've seen tonight, I have tried to minimise it.
I decided it was high time to move HPC:Factor from IIS 6 to IIS 7.5 and from 32-bit to 64-bit (yippie). I am still in the process of moving things, but I have effectively done a live migration from one to the other with what I'm hoping was less than 4 minutes of down time.
PLEASE report any error, anomalies, crashes or bugs. This site is so big that almost always the first I know of problems is when you guys tell me and I seldom have not even the slightest idea there are any!
I will be upgrading the sites code library over the weekend to bring it up to standard; it has been a couple of years since I last synched the site with my class library. So you may seem some things dropping out over the weekend as I find and fix regression bugs. |
|
|
|
H/PC Elite Posts: | 732 |
Location: | England, UK | Status: | |
| Bit of a coincidence to me really. 64-bit only means unlimited RAM to me if it's an operating system I'm thinking about, does it mean anything similar in this case? |
|
|
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 17,497 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| Why coincidence, did you just upgrade to x64 too?
Unlimited RAM is a misconception, most consumer systems only have a 35-bit address register (16GB) or a 36-bit address register (32GB)
Practically it means
My entire server far is now 64-bit
I no longer have any Windows Server 2003 systems to support
The site gets 7 years worth of enchangement in IIS behind it
It's running with 64-bit extensions which make the server a little safer to be out on the www
End-to-end processing between the SQL server and the httpd is all 64-bit
The performance ceiling of the site just got raised - not that we were anywhere near it |
|
|
|
Factor Fanatic Posts: | 67 |
Location: | Redmond, WA | Status: | |
| Just to let you know, the base a record (http://hpcfactor.com) is producing an iis error when I hit it. the www works fine, as I'm sure everyone's aware
Cheers - |
|
|
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 4,995 |
Location: | United States | Status: | |
| neomagick, yea, I've noticed the same thing, I think I remember when I was here from 2005-2007 that the www was always more reliable and easier on the server... I could be mis-remembering though. |
|
|
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 17,497 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| It's because I don't wnt you using the root domain  |
|
|
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 4,995 |
Location: | United States | Status: | |
| Those Android users won't be happy that you're not letting them root..
/s |
|
|
|
Administrator H/PC Oracle Posts: | 17,497 |
Location: | United Kingdom | Status: | |
| boom, boom...  |
|
|
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 4,995 |
Location: | United States | Status: | |
| Sorry about that, C:Amie, I think I should've refrained from being sarcastic in that instance..
Edit-clarifying post so I come across correctly.
Edited by torchwood04 2011-08-05 9:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Subscribers H/PC Vanguard Posts: | 4,995 |
Location: | United States | Status: | |
| Slight amusing fact--for the longest time, typing www in my browser picked up HPC:Factor as first result, so I start typing the w's and press return :P .
Edited by torch 2011-08-30 3:12 AM
|
|
|