Quote
AntiPasta - 2006-11-04 3:43 PM
Well, I DO have quite a bit of ARM assembly under my belt, as well as low-level programming skills on various systems. I've never done anything with Jornada or CE though, and can barely solder two wires together. I'm not sure if I can be of much use, but i'm willing to try, given some assistance. Take it or leave it :-)
hey, that's cool!!! could you please register on this forum as a start
not mandatory of course..
and it would be good to have some contact info of yours
(email? irc? IM?
)
Quote
AntiPasta - 2006-11-04 8:48 PM
Yeah, we'd need the 4.2 platform builder to even start thinking about the feasibility.
Mind you, does CE even support booting from a CF card? From the CPU's point of view, the mode of operation is different from hardwired ROM - as far as I know, the SA1111 doesn't handle this transparently.
CE
(3.0, 4.2
) can definitely boot off a CF card. only the bootloader has to support this additionally. both the nec 900 and 900c bootloaders do, for example. their bootloaders call it RAM OS.
i should dig in platform builder to see what it has to say about this format.
as for the sa1110-1111, the smartbook has same strongarm 206mhz, and its bootloader can load "shadow" OS'es
(thats how smartbook calls it
), which is again a non XIP OS, as far as i understand, it is flashed in ROM by the bootloader and then loaded from ROM into RAM. i guess for performance reasons? the default is XIP on all the smartbooks i've ever seen.
this is of course not the same as booting off CF but it is interesting.
Quote
ntware - 2006-11-04 7:28 PM
I agree with oflash! It's better if we start from the begining, and as I said, with a bootloader like the linux one... Cmonex, do you have the images of CE4.2?? We can start playing around with this...
it's not just a question of having some cenet 4.2 images
Quote
oflash - 2006-11-04 11:55 PM
Valid points. Maybe CE 5 is the way to go. Chiark, would you like to spearhead communication with Mark?
CE 5 no longer supports the strongarm by default, but maybe there's a way around this
Quote
chiark - 2006-11-04 10:59 PM
not only do you need platform builder, you need licensing terms from MS. I don't think that 4.2 licenses can be had nowadays if I recall correctly from the newsgroups...
Please just bear in the back of your minds how you will legally jump that hurdle if/when we get to it.
Best thing to do for now would be to get the bootloader working. Has anyone spoken to Mark Gollahon?
oh i think even the eval 4.2 allows for flashing homemade bin's, but of course redistribution is limited.
(not 100% limited though
)
if you tell me his email address i'm willing to contact him. thanks!
i have a suggestion too, what about talking in a more real time way, for example irc
for a start, #hpcdev at efnet irc server could do, or any other channel / server of course
(i have another server in mind that i could recommend
).
Edited by cmonex 2006-11-05 3:55 AM