x
This website is using cookies. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. More info. That's Fine
HPC:Factor Logo 
 
Latest Forum Activity

Compact Flash defragmentation

SujetoTacito Page Icon Posted 2004-09-28 2:11 PM
#
Avatar image of SujetoTacito
H/PC Newbie

Posts:
11
Location:
Argentina
Status:
Is there any benefit on defrag a compact flash card?
It’s not a hard drive whit a head moving from one place to another. I suppose that the seek time should be the same if the card is totally fragmented or defragmented.

Anyone have more accurate info about this?
 Top of the page
C:Amie Page Icon Posted 2004-09-28 2:44 PM
#
Avatar image of C:Amie
Administrator
H/PC Oracle

Posts:
17,987
Location:
United Kingdom
Status:
As it is a solid state media, everything is running about at light speed anyway. Invariably there shouldn't be that much of a performance hit, although there will be some on access to lots of small files as the system will need to queery the File Allocation Table many many times.

I do not recommend that you defrag a CF volume for the reasons outlined in the first few paragraphs of this article:
http://www.hpcfactor.com/reviews/software/flash-format-2-61/
 Top of the page
chiark Page Icon Posted 2004-09-28 5:23 PM
#
Avatar image of chiark
H/PC Sensei

Posts:
1,330
Location:
North of England
Status:
It'll make no performance effective difference.

I would counsel against it, as a defrag hammers the FAT (file allocation table - an area of the disk which contains information on what files are physically where on a disk) and CF cards have a fixed read/write lifecycle.

However, it ain't all doom and gloom with CF cards. Some cards employ on the fly remapping (so I am led to believe) which will map out sectors or areas that have had too many writes, such as the original fat, and replace them seamlessly. Others contend that the life cycle of writes is in the order of millions before problems occur. Either way, I ain't losing sleep over it
 Top of the page
Jump to forum:
Seconds to generate: 0.140 - Cached queries : 60 - Executed queries : 9